Culling the Shelves

This post at Salon looks at the necessity of weeding through the home library. Probably not going to read that biography again? It’s out. That extra copy of The Great Gatsby? Don’t need it. That novel you got as a birthday gift but probably aren’t going to crack? Gone.

Still, it can be hard to remove books from your shelves, even if you aren’t attached the the individual titles. What happens if you give away a book and suddenly want it again?

“But any book weeder, no matter how lenient, inevitably wonders if he’s weeding too much. Like many readers, I’ve often confronted the basic dilemma of culling one’s shelves, which is that the book one gives away today is the very title that will be needed — or fervently desired — tomorrow. I feel a tinge of grievance each time I’m required to visit my public library and borrow reference books that, in some previous clean-out, I donated to the collection. As if plotting to spring them from jail, I sometimes wonder if I can secretly steal them back. A friend of mine still mourns for a poetry anthology she let go many years ago — a book that she can never hope to recover since she’s long forgotten its name.”

It’s literary anxiety–what if you make the wrong choice about what books to give away? It’s better to just keep them all, right? After all, books are good for you. It’s not like hoarding shoes that don’t fit anymore or old birthday cards or coats you won’t wear again. The more books, the better, right?

Well, that’s not exactly true either:

“A librarian friend tells me that weeding a book collection can increase readership, allowing gems to emerge from the clutter. My most recent book weeding reconnected me with lots of old books I’d like to revisit, including Lewis Thomas’ “The Youngest Science” and Somerset Maugham’s “Ashenden.” Rediscovering these keepers has been like finding spare money in last year’s jacket.

The extra shelf space gained from a morning’s worth of weeding is a nice dividend, too. Maybe I won’t feel too guilty — at least for a little while — as the shelves slowly refill.”

I like the idea that any space you leave opens you up for new reading experiences, or the opportunity to revisit books you previously loved. Recently, my husband and I gave away a couple boxes of books and shifted some of the remaining to a new bookshelf. Now I feel like I get to see books I had been missing before. (Granted, lots of books had been hidden behind others.)

It can be hard to give away books, but in the end it’s worth it. And if you give away a book you later want again, you can search it out at the library or admit your mistake and reinvest in another copy. But so far I haven’t had any regrets from sending old books to new owners.

Do you have a hard time giving away books?

Poem to Go

One of the most fun National Poetry Month projects I’ve seen is Poem in Your Pocket Day. In Charlottesville, VA (one of my very favorite places in the world), Poem in Your Pocket Day has been lead by the fantastic librarians at the Jefferson-Madison Regional Library. Take a look at how they shared thousands of poems with Charlottesville residents in 2010:

So glad to hear about the response, including the enthusiasm of volunteers. Well done, Cville poem-lovers!

This year’s Poem in Your Pocket Day will be on Thursday, April 26. Any plans to share a poem?

Cave Boys and Girls

At A Chair, a Fireplace, and a Tea Cozy, Liz has great look at the Cave, a boy-focused reading area of one school’s library. The topic of boys being reluctant readers isn’t new, and while I think it’s great that librarians are looking for ways to share books with boys, it’s hard to get enthusiastic about an idea that makes girl readers feel unwelcome. As Liz says:

“I just wish that it was done in a way that did not exclude girls from an opportunity for ownership and empowerment; and did not do it in a way that says, “this is a boys area but girls are welcome, also.” Because, personally, I find that not welcoming or equal. Labelling books as either “boy” or “girl” does a disservice to boys, girls, and books and limits rather than enhances reading opportunities.”

I think the Cave would be more successful if it had the same elements–books about adventure or fantasy, funny books, cool decor–but didn’t label anything as gendered. Why can’t boys and girls both get excited about Eragon or Wimpy Kid? Even if more boys end up in that part of the library, there’s no suggestion that it’s where boys should by or where girls can’t be. Shouldn’t we be moving towards a society of readers that doesn’t care if the main character or author of a book is male or female?

Links Galore

A few more mid-week links:

Links Galore

A few more fun links for the afternoon:

  • No, those Catching Fire paperbacks aren’t coming to a bookstore near you.
  • What makes a cookbook publishable? One point I’d add: a successful food blog.
  • Tales from the slush pile.
  • Finding new books online is great, but there’s nothing quite like browsing in person.
  • Walt has a great post about why stage directions are necessary, even if some people use them poorly. Just like the semicolon!
  • Library Journal’s Movers and Shakers list spotlights people enhancing library communities and studies. Lots of cool profiles here.

Productivity Plus Caffiene

When I was in college, there were a few choices for study locations. There were libraries with total silence and beautiful shelves of books and large wooden tables. There were libraries with total silence and 70s-style carrels. (Ugh.) There were nooks within student centers, tables in cafes, libraries that no one really knew about because they were hidden in the Physics Building. You could claim studying but actually socialize and no one would notice. You could steal a grad student’s desk and hope they didn’t kick you out before you got through your reading. You could fall asleep on a dorm-style couch and totally miss your final.

My favorite place to work was the first floor of one particular library, right near the entrance. It had a good, classic library feel–dark wood, tall ceilings, excellent lighting. There was a small square of chairs that were cozy enough to make you comfortable but not too cozy to make you fall asleep. There was always a fair amount of traffic, and it was right next to the library cafe–perfect for coffee/tea addicts like me. I would take my discman (yes, I’m that old) and put on a good study mix and rock out with an art history flashcards or astronomy notes. I liked being surrounded by activity but a little bit separate from it. Even now, I don’t like being in total quiet to work. I prefer to go to a coffee shop or library to get work done.

Apparently a new study agrees with me that a little background noise/activity is the right setting for getting work done:

“The study adds to research suggesting that small doses of distraction — including hard-to-read fonts — prompt the mind to work at a more abstract level, which is also a more creative level….The effect of noise is inverted-U-shaped, this study suggested: There’s a sweet spot between silence and din.”

My work habits are totally in line with this study. If I’m at a coffee shop, I’m energized by the activity but am able to zone out much of the actual noise. Plus, I like the social pressure of working around other people. Even if no one notices that I’m actually on Facebook, I feel more pressure to have my Word document open in front of me. I need to look like a real writer! At home, no one notices if I don’t look like a real writer. (Plus, at home it’s easy to segue from my desk into a nap.)

Do you tend to work best with a little distraction, or do you prefer total isolation to get your creativity going?

(image: jimmyjames33)

Support Library Funding

Two more reasons to contact your US Representative. From the National Children’s Book and Literary Alliance:

“Appropriations season is now underway in Washington, D. C. It’s crucial that you call your U.S. Representative today and ask him or her to sign two separate “Dear Colleague” letters that support funding for libraries.

One letter, found here, supports funding for the Innovative Approaches to Literacy Grant in FY13. This grant is crucial because at least half of it would go to low-income school libraries to help update their books and materials.

The other letter, found here, supports funding for the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) in FY13. LSTA is the primary source of funding for libraries in the federal budget.”

Click through for more info from the NCBLA.

Links Galore

Lots of good links today!