It’s a Book, and Other Ways to Look at the Genre Question

Jaclyn Moriarty wrote one of my favorite YA novels, Feeling Sorry for Celia. I read it when I was in high school and loved the honest look at how friendships change, paired with a hilarious and sharp voice.

Now she has a new book coming out and, during the writing and publishing process, grappled with the category. She’d initially envisioned it as a children’s book. When that wasn’t working, she wrote it as a YA novel. But her publishers read it and thought it might actually be a better fit in the adult section. Moriarty was worried that it wouldn’t end up appealing to adult readers and wouldn’t be available to teen readers. I like her publishers’ response:

“In the end my publishers said: Why does it have to be one thing or another? An adult book, a teen book, a cross-over book?’

‘It’s a book,’ they said. ‘We’ll publish it as a book.’”

Although I’m a huge supporter of YA as a genre and connecting teen readers with books that will resonate with their life experiences, I really like the simplicity of “It’s a book.” While it would be great to think that all readers approach books with an open mind, it’s easy to set up barriers for yourself. When Walt suggested we watch Battlestar Galactica, I balked. “I don’t like sci-fi,” I said. Except I ended up loving BSG and Doctor Who and lots of other sci-fi programs. I think a lot of people have the same reaction to YA and end up missing out on a lot of fantastic books.

But even with the support of her publisher, Moriarty still had to deal with the question of why she was writing outside of her genre. I’ve talked about this kind of thing with other YA writers, and the idea that you can only write stories as a YA author/fantasy writer/romance novelist is tough. Lots of times your ideas flow into the same category, but that’s not always the case. (Look at Lois Lowry’s bibliography to get a sense of what range an author can have.) There’s a lot of pressure to establish your voice/brand as an author, which largely means writing similar kinds of books. But are we limiting authors and readers by focusing so much on which category a book should fit into?

With more adult readers branching into YA, hopefully this won’t be too much of an issue in years to come. For now, I hope we can all encourage each other to look at books of all categories and genres as just that–books.

Make sure to check out the whole article about Moriarty’s latest book and the question of genre.

Links Galore

A few more links for today

Links Galore

A few more links for today:

Celebrate Reading With Banned Books Week

Happy Banned Books Week, everyone! It’s a great time to honor the librarians, educators, and authors who stand up for books and knowledge and against prejudice and hate. Censorship doesn’t help society. Books do.

Check out Bill Moyers’ video about the importance of Banned Books Week, and then watch other famous authors and literary advocates talk about censorship and how it relates to their own work.

Also loving this fantastic timeline, 30 Years of Liberating Literature, from the ALA. It contains some fantastic information about bans on classic books, such as:

The Giver, by Lois Lowry
In 2003, “The Giver” was challenged as suggested reading for eighth-grade students in Blue Springs, MO, where parents called the book “lewd” and “twisted” and pleaded for it to be tossed out of the district. The book was reviewed by two committees and recommended for retention, but the controversy continued for more than two years. Lowry’s novel for young readers has frequently attracted objections due to its “mature themes” including suicide, sexuality, and euthanasia. “The Giver” received the Newbery Medal in 1994.

I’ve mentioned here before how much I love this book and, as a middle-schooler, I was grateful to read about these mature themes. It was the first book that really got me thinking about the value of life (all of life) and how we should function as a society. It infuriates me to think that some people want to take that away from young readers.

It’s easy to feel complacent about our overall access to books, but Banned Books Week is a great reminder that we need to appreciate the access we have and work toward giving everyone that same access. Celebrate with your favorite banned book today and all week long!

(image: Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression 2011 Banned Books Week celebration, sponsored by the Freedom to Read Foundation’s Judith F. Krug Memorial Fund, via ALA)

Quote of the Day

“I was taken out to lunch and offered, with great ceremony, the opportunity to be an editor in the adult department? The implication, of course, was that since I had learned to publish books for children with considerable success perhaps I was now ready to move along (or up) to the adult field. I almost pushed the luncheon table into the lap of the pompous gentleman opposite me and then explained kindly that publishing children’s book was what I did, that I couldn’t possibly be interested in books for dead dull finished adults, and thank you very much but I had to get back to my desk to publish some more good books for bad children.”–Ursula Nordstrom

Currently reading Dear Genius: The Letters of Ursula Nordstrom by Leonard S. Marcus and loving it. Nordstrom worked closely with authors and illustrators like E.B. White, Maurice Sendak, and Shel Silverstein. Pretty awesome career, right? And I love her commitment to children’s literature as a whole, as indicated in the quote above.

(image via Charlotte Zolotow)

How to Make a Book

There’s a lot that goes into making a book. Fortunately, PublishingTrendsetter.com has created a great series on the life cycle of a book, including this fantastic infographic:

Even for people who kind of know the publishing world, it’s really helpful to see everything mapped out here. For even more info, make sure to check out all the video interviews with people in the business.

(image: PublishingTrendsetter.com)(via Darla Writes)(H/T Kathryn Johnston)

In 75 Years, That Rejection Will Be Invalid

Don’t worry about those rejection letters. One day, when you’re considered one of the greatest American writers ever, The New Yorker will backtrack and publish that short story they passed on before you got famous.

At least, that’s what happened with F. Scott Fitzgerald. Recently his grandchildren found the rejected story in his papers. Fitzgerald scholar and editor James West passed it along to The New Yorker staff, who are going to run the story this week. The first time around, they weren’t so kind:

“The magazine wrote in an internal message that it was “altogether out of the question. It seems to us so curious and so unlike the kind of thing we associate with him and really too fantastic.””

Okay, so Fitzgerald’s not around to enjoy this belated triumph, but the rest of us can wave our rejection letters in solidarity.

(image: GoodReads)